Diversity, equity and inclusion strategies in the U.S may not work globally. Here's why.

by Feli Carrique
Feb 17, 2022 in Diversity and Inclusion
Women smiling at each other and talking

For years, global media discussions have been centered around U.S.-based organizations and examples for innovation, business models, and reporting styles often flow globally from North to South. Now, something similar is happening around DEI initiatives.

The push towards DEI initiatives in U.S. media is a great thing, and it can help raise analog concerns in places where there hasn’t been so much reckoning. However, assuming that the same initiatives implemented to deal with discrimination in the US. are applicable elsewhere is inaccurate and short-sighted.

As it also happens with innovation, business models, and reporting styles, DEI initiatives don’t happen in a vacuum. Discrimination dynamics around the world take different forms due to historical, political, and economical circumstances. Each place has its own trajectories, both of oppression and resistance. To address these issues with a perspective developed for U.S.-based experiences and challenges will keep global newsrooms away from exploring their specific inequity problems at home.

While some aspects could even hold certain similarities across borders, copy-pasting solutions that were designed for the New York Times are unlikely to succeed in newsrooms in Buenos Aires, or Havana.

For example, the Latinx category is commonly used in the U.S to identify both migrants and descendants from the rest of the Americas. However, such classification cannot be applied in Latin American countries, where the term has no meaning as to whether a person might be considered part of a racial minority or not.

The tactics that work for a major U.S. newsroom are not necessarily the ones that would work elsewhere because journalists and leaders elsewhere are trying to solve different problems, such as: In Argentina, most people believe there is no racism even though there is little to no representation for non-European descendants in the media industry. And what’s worse, going through an American-based process provides international leaders with the placebo effect of thinking they are actually doing something to make a change.

In each society, aspects such as gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, religion, race, national identities, and class are subject to different historically-informed arrangements. A deep understanding of these configurations is key for addressing inequity and developing solution alternatives in specific contexts.

There is an industry-wide challenge in finding ways to ensure that these relationships are taken into account when developing training, information products, and work processes for media organizations around the world. We need to make an effort to understand local realities because that is the only way in which we can catalyze change and foster a really inclusive global media industry.

I believe that news product is a discipline that could play a positive role in these matters. It is based on a profound understanding of audiences’ needs and developing news products to serve them. In that sense, Product practice can provide organizations with information about how to make information more accessible and equitable.

As News Product Alliance’s Executive Director, I am fortunate to have many types of opportunities to contribute to this mission. Some of the steps I am taking in 2022 are:

  • Make sure to be intentional about including more voices from diverse backgrounds into our programming as participants, trainers, mentors, DEI consultants, or coaches.
  • As our team grows, make sure that the staffing represents the diversity of our global community.
  • Offer resources to incorporate a systemic perspective with an emphasis on how dynamics of exclusion operate, as part of the news product thinking process.

This is my commitment to refine the definition of what discrimination and inclusion mean for the global journalism industry, and more specifically, for the news product discipline. Because, if we only consume one type of discourse around diversity, equity, and inclusion we won’t find the right solutions for other contexts, and leave journalists from marginalized backgrounds away and voices unheard.

This article was originally published by OpenNews Source, as part of their Sincerly, Leaders of Color series run by P. Kim Bui and Emma Carew Grovum. It was republished on IJNet with permission. 

Photo by Christina @ wocintechchat.com on Unsplash.