Go offline to do great stories, former CNN journalist says


Go offline to do great stories, former CNN journalist says

Andy Shuai Liu | March 27, 2012

Social media have transformed the way news is gathered and consumed, but over-reliance on technology can get in the way of excellent journalism.

“The best journalism is reporting on stories by digging up information, adding analysis and putting it into context in a way that’s not already on Google,” said Rebecca MacKinnon, former CNN journalist, co-founder of of Global Voices Online and currently a senior fellow with the New America Foundation.

Fluent in Mandarin Chinese, California-born MacKinnon spent parts of her early years in China and India. Over the past decade, she has been a global activist for Internet freedom and wrote Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom. In a recent talk at the American University’s Global Social Media Research Symposium and an interview with IJNet, she shared her view on social media, news objectivity and advocacy journalism.

Use but don’t over-rely on social media

“Journalists should not rely too much on online resources and downplay in-person skills. When I taught online journalism in Hong Kong, I found younger journalists sometimes over-relied on the Internet by getting all their story ideas from Google, Twitter, Facebook and other social networks. The real value journalists bring is not repetition, but going out in the real world and reporting on stories people cannot find online. Often, you don't really know what the story is until you get to the place, talk to the people there and ask them the right questions. In addition, online communications tools such as e-mail may not be secure enough to protect your sources.”

Offline engagement is as important as social media

“Social media are not the sole deciding factor that drives the success of social movements. The Arab Spring started out at the ‘1.0 stage’ before people used the Internet and social media to spread the word for their cause. For years, the most influential and creative activists from Tunisia, Egypt and other Arab countries actually met in person at a number of Arab blogger meetings. Offline exchange and personal ties were among the keys to the success of the movement in Egypt.”

Don’t let fake objectivity undermine morality

“All journalists should seek and respect facts. There is a difference between not being objective and having a moral compass and being an editorialist. In advocacy journalism, I don’t see how I can hide what I think is right behind some fake 'objectivity,' when, for example, someone is killed for peacefully advocating their opinions. There is a role for the kind of fact-based journalism which aims to make an impact and persuade people to take action on important issues.

"The classic American journalistic approach to objectivity is [specific to the United States]. If you look at journalism in Europe, the newspaper can be much more closely tied to political parties or ideological stances. It is common for many parts of the world to have journalism where people are pursuing facts and telling the truth while entering a political or ethical point of view. For some reason, a lot of American journalism schools act as if that phenomenon does not exist.”

You can watch the two-hour Global Social Media Research Symposium here.

Photo: Rebecca MacKinnon at the American University




Advocacy Journalism vs Objective Journalism

As much as I respect those who engage in what Mackinnon terms "advocacy journalism" (& this world needs as many advocacy journalists as possible!), I do feel that there is still a place for traditional objective journalism. It's interesting, though, that Mackinnon calls the latter an "American approach"; I was trained in the U.S., after all. I'd like to hear the opinions of others who weren't trained in the U.S. Thank you! @OdileW

Re: @OdileW

Dear Odile, thanks for your comment. Great point raised here. Both Rebecca MacKinnon and [Atul Singh of Fair Observer]( acknowledge the necessary roles of both "objective journalism" and "subjective / advocacy journalism." I believe many of us are, like you, eager to learn more what works and what does not for journalism in different countries and cultures. I hope the international followers of IJNet can chime in and share their diverse experiences on this. Thanks again.


Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Twitter message links are opened in new windows and rel="nofollow" is added.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Please log in or register in order to comment this post.